We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Who Was Behind the Lindbergh Kidnaping?

By Garry Crystal
Updated Mar 06, 2024
Our promise to you
HistoricalIndex is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At HistoricalIndex, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Lindbergh kidnapping involved the abduction of the son of world famous aviator Charles Lindbergh, Jr. Charles Lindbergh III was born on 22 June 1930 and kidnapped from his home on 1 March 1932. The kidnapping was the biggest story at the time, and the events surrounding the kidnapping and ransom demands were shambolic to say the least.

Many books and articles have been written regarding who was behind the Lindbergh kidnapping. Speculations over the real culprit have been rife. Although two ransom demands were paid, only one man was ever convicted and sentenced to murder. Bruno Hauptmann was executed on 3 April 1936 for the kidnapping and murder of the toddler.

Bruno Hauptmann never changed his plea of not guilty to the murder of the child. He was offered a last minute change of sentence to life imprisonment to confess to the murder, but refused. He was also offered $90,000 US dollars (USD) to confess by a newspaper. This was a huge sum at the time, which could have been used to take care of Hauptmann’s wife and child after his death, but Hauptmann would not change his plea and claimed he would not plead guilty to a crime he had not committed.

Evidence linking Hauptmann to a large portion of the ransom demand was valid, but the evidence as to whether or not he had any part in the Lindbergh kidnapping or murder was shaky to say the least. One of the witnesses who claimed Hauptmann had been at the ransom point was declared legally blind at the time. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) documents regarding the case that were declassified in 1990 have since been reviewed, and many experts claim that the court case was a blatant frame up.

There was also no real proof that the baby found dead in a wooded area was the Lindbergh baby. The baby’s doctor at the time said the body was so badly decomposed that he could not identify it. The only other piece of evidence linking Hauptmann to the Lindbergh kidnapping was the homemade ladder found outside the Lindbergh’s child’s window. Evidence at the time of the Lindbergh kidnapping showed that the ladder was made from the same wood found in Hauptmann's attic, but in 1985, a book by Ludvic Kennedy called The Airman and the Carpenter stated that the wood in the attic was a different thickness from the ladder.

The truth as to who was behind the Lindbergh kidnapping may never come to light. Many people were involved in the case at the time, including the New York underworld. While pursuing the possibility of an inside job, investigators questioned the Lindbergh’s housekeeper, Violet Sharpe. Sharpe lied about her whereabouts on the night of the kidnapping and eventually committed suicide.

The Lindbergh kidnapping was a case full of red herrings, false leads, and unreliable witnesses. It was also a media farce in which copies of the leaked ransom note were sold on the streets of New York for $5 USD. Until her death in 1994, Hauptmann’s widow professed her husband’s innocence.

HistoricalIndex is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Related Articles

Discussion Comments

By anon13440 — On May 27, 2008

what about the cab driver???? a cab driver delivered two ransom notes and couldn't identify the person who gave them the note.... if it was me i think that i would be able to identify a person who randomly handed me a note and told me to deliver it to someone.

HistoricalIndex, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

HistoricalIndex, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.