We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the Shroud of Turin?

By Jane Harmon
Updated Mar 06, 2024
Our promise to you
HistoricalIndex is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At HistoricalIndex, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Shroud of Turin is an ancient artifact that many believe to be the burial shroud of Jesus Christ. Kept as a religious relic in the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist in Turin, the Shroud is a bolt of cloth approximately 15 feet (4½ meters) long by 3½ feet (1 meter) wide. It is thought to be a burial shroud because it bears a faint image, barely discernible except in photographs, of a man's body. The image on the shroud shows a man who bears wounds consistent with death by crucifixion. There are two images, head to head, as if a body were laid on the cloth, feet at one edge, and the cloth was folded over the body.

The earliest provable appearance of the Shroud of Turin was in 1357, in France. It was claimed then to be Jesus' burial cloth, and earlier reports exist that might refer to the same cloth in various places on its journey to - eventually - Turin, but 1357 is the first appearance after which the location of the Shroud was continuously known.

There are numerous theories, miraculous and natural, to explain how the image came to be on the Shroud of Turin. The miraculous explanation is that the image formed at the moment that Jesus was resurrected, as a byproduct of the energy that was released. A more natural explanation is that it was a chemical interaction, similar to photography, between the cloth of the shroud and the gas released by a decomposing body. This explanation, if true, says nothing to the identity of the shroud's inhabitant.

Some scientists even entertain the possibility that the image on the shroud is a hoax perpetrated in the Middle Ages, perhaps by Leonardo da Vinci, known to love jokes and hoaxes of this sort. Others point to the fact that the image was visible before Leonardo's day. This doesn't mean it isn't a hoax, of course, but lessens the possibility that Leonardo was the culprit, although it is still possible that he augmented a chance resemblance to a man's face with a little artistic license.

In 1988, tiny fragments of the Shroud of Turin were collected for carbon-dating. Since the material being dated is destroyed in the test, the owners of the Shroud were reluctant to part with more than minute threads. The carbon-dating test, which can accurately tell the age of anything once living, such as the fibers that made up the cloth itself, put the fabric's age squarely in the Middle Ages. That is, if the carbon-dating was done correctly, the Shroud of Turin could not possibly be the burial shroud of Jesus, since the fabric came from plants that lived over a thousand years after his time.

Many people invested in the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin claim that the carbon-dating of the shroud proves nothing. The chapel housing the shroud was damaged in a fire in the 1500s - the test might have simply dated particles of smoke or ash from that fire, they claim. The threads might also have been drawn from patches that were put on the shroud after this event. Whatever the case, no further samples have been made available for scientific dating. As a result, people who want to believe in the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin, and people who want to believe it is a hoax or an artifact of the Middle Ages, are equally free to do so.

HistoricalIndex is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By anon21987 — On Nov 25, 2008

i wish just to tell that no problem shall remain unsolved and no truth - unrevealed, at last !

Simply,

joseph of arimathea was a disciple of god osiris

and also my personal doctor-and-friend (of queen cleopatra 007), as before. This is why he was directed from the heaven

how to save the life of my beloved husband lord jesus christ,

so that not to be cut into 14 or more pieces-and-eaten once again,

just like joseph, the step-father of jesus,

being also a disciple of god osiris in egypt, bulgaria, was sent to take physical care of him !

Regards,

trinity = the true virgin (by rank) and the biblical serpent-scorpio (by zodiac)

goddess isis-mary magdalene

HistoricalIndex, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

HistoricalIndex, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.